
使用一些隐藏的
javac功能,我们可以获得有关正在发生的事情的更多信息:
$ javac -XDverboseResolution=deferred-inference,success,applicable LambdaInference.java LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: <none> with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Object>)Object) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: Deferred instantiation of method <T>foo(Bar<T>) Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here^ instantiated signature: (Bar<Object>)Object target-type: <none> where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: error: cannot find symbol Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ symbol: method booleanValue() location: class Object1 error
这是很多信息,让我们对其进行分解。
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: <none> with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Object>)Object) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)
阶段:方法适用性阶段
实际情况:在
类型参数中传递的实际参数:显式类型参数
候选项:可能适用的方法
实际情况是
<none>因为我们的隐式lambda
与适用性无关。
编译器解决您的调用
foo来命名的唯一方法
foo在
Foo。它已经部分实例化到
Foo.<Object> foo(因为没有实际值或type-
args),但是可以在推论阶段改变。
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: Deferred instantiation of method <T>foo(Bar<T>) Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here^ instantiated signature: (Bar<Object>)Object target-type: <none> where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)
实例化签名:的完全实例化签名
foo。这是此步骤的结果(此时,将不再对的签名进行类型推断
foo)。
target-type:在其中进行调用的上下文。如果方法调用是分配的一部分,则它将在左侧。如果方法调用本身是方法调用的一部分,则它将是参数类型。
由于您的方法调用是悬空的,因此没有目标类型。由于没有目标类型,因此无法进行进一步的推断,
foo并
T推断为
Object。
分析
编译器在推理期间不使用隐式类型的lambda。在某种程度上,这是有道理的。通常,给定的类型
param ->BODY是您将无法编译。如果您确实尝试推断from
的类型,则可能会导致鸡和蛋的类型出现问题。在将来的Java版本中,可能对此进行一些改进。
BODY``param``param``BODY
解决方案
Foo.<Boolean> foo(value -> true)
此解决方案提供了一个显式类型参数
foo(请注意以下
with type-args部分)。这会将方法签名的部分实例化更改为
(Bar<Boolean>)Boolean,这就是您想要的。
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Foo.<Boolean> foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: <none> with type-args: Boolean candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method booleanValue in type Boolean to candidate 0 Foo.<Boolean> foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: no arguments with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: booleanValue()
Foo.foo((Value<Boolean> value) -> true)
该解决方案显式地键入您的lambda,从而使其与适用性相关(请注意
withactuals以下内容)。这会将方法签名的部分实例化更改为
(Bar<Boolean>)Boolean,这就是您想要的。
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Foo.foo((Value<Boolean> value) -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: Bar<Boolean> with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: Deferred instantiation of method <T>foo(Bar<T>) Foo.foo((Value<Boolean> value) -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here^ instantiated signature: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean target-type: <none> where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method booleanValue in type Boolean to candidate 0 Foo.foo((Value<Boolean> value) -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: no arguments with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: booleanValue()
Foo.foo((Bar<Boolean>) value -> true)
与上述相同,但口味略有不同。
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Foo.foo((Bar<Boolean>) value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: Bar<Boolean> with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: Deferred instantiation of method <T>foo(Bar<T>) Foo.foo((Bar<Boolean>) value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here^ instantiated signature: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean target-type: <none> where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method booleanValue in type Boolean to candidate 0 Foo.foo((Bar<Boolean>) value -> true).booleanValue(); // Compile error here ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: no arguments with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: booleanValue()
Boolean b = Foo.foo(value -> true)
该解决方案为您的方法调用提供了一个明确的目标(请参见
target-type下文)。这使deferred-
instantiation可以推断应该使用type参数
Boolean代替
Object(请参见
instantiated signature下文)。
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Boolean b = Foo.foo(value -> true); ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: <none> with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Object>)Object) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: Deferred instantiation of method <T>foo(Bar<T>) Boolean b = Foo.foo(value -> true); ^ instantiated signature: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean target-type: Boolean where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)
免责声明
这是正在发生的行为。我不知道这是JLS中指定的内容。我可以四处挖掘,看看是否可以找到指定此行为的确切部分,但是类型推断符号使我头疼。
这也不能完全解释为什么更改
Bar为使用原始格式
Value可以解决此问题:
LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method foo in type Foo to candidate 0 Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: <none> with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: <T>foo(Bar<T>) (partially instantiated to: (Bar<Object>)Object) where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: Deferred instantiation of method <T>foo(Bar<T>) Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue();^ instantiated signature: (Bar<Boolean>)Boolean target-type: <none> where T is a type-variable: T extends Object declared in method <T>foo(Bar<T>)LambdaInference.java:16: Note: resolving method booleanValue in type Boolean to candidate 0 Foo.foo(value -> true).booleanValue(); ^ phase: BASIC with actuals: no arguments with type-args: no arguments candidates: #0 applicable method found: booleanValue()
出于某种原因,将其更改为使用原始
Value格式将允许延迟的实例推断
T为
Boolean。如果我不得不推测的话,我可能会猜想,当编译器尝试将lambda适配到时
Bar<T>,它可以通过查看lambda的主体来推断出这
T一点
Boolean。这意味着我先前的分析是不正确的。编译器
可以 对lambda主体执行类型推断,但只能对 仅 出现在返回类型中的类型变量执行。
欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:内存溢出
微信扫一扫
支付宝扫一扫
评论列表(0条)