
int counterValue = 0;NSLog(@"Count at init: %d",counterValue);...-(IBAction)pushbutton { NSLog(@"Count (Pre-Push) = %d",counterValue); counterValue++; NSLog(@"Count (Post-Push) = %d",counterValue);} 输出如下:
2010-02-20 18:39:39.125 My App[37536:207] Count at init: 02010-02-20 18:39:39.845 My App[37536:207] Count (Pre-Push) = 02010-02-20 18:39:39.846 My App[37536:207] Count (Post-Push) = 42010-02-20 18:39:40.165 My App[37536:207] Count (Pre-Push) = 42010-02-20 18:39:40.166 My App[37536:207] Count (Post-Push) = 82010-02-20 18:39:40.727 My App[37536:207] Count (Pre-Push) = 82010-02-20 18:39:40.728 My App[37536:207] Count (Post-Push) = 12解决方法 你显示的代码确实不应该这样做。我做了快速的程序来仔细检查,我得到了预期的结果:
2010-02-22 17:04:35.787 app[68267:a0f] Count (Pre-Push) = 02010-02-22 17:04:35.790 app[68267:a0f] Count (Post-Push) = 12010-02-22 17:04:35.923 app[68267:a0f] Count (Pre-Push) = 12010-02-22 17:04:35.924 app[68267:a0f] Count (Post-Push) = 2
我最好的猜测是你已经用另一个类型为int *的变量来反映了counterValue,它是通过sizeof(int)而不是1来增加的。
总结以上是内存溢出为你收集整理的iphone – 在Objective-C中,为什么增加4而不是1?全部内容,希望文章能够帮你解决iphone – 在Objective-C中,为什么增加4而不是1?所遇到的程序开发问题。
如果觉得内存溢出网站内容还不错,欢迎将内存溢出网站推荐给程序员好友。
欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:内存溢出
微信扫一扫
支付宝扫一扫
评论列表(0条)